|
KMID : 0895420050150030183
|
|
Journal of Korean Society of Occupational and Enviromental Hygiene
2005 Volume.15 No. 3 p.183 ~ p.191
|
|
|
Comparative Study on the EXciency Test Using Remodeled Bubble Generating Pump for Aquarium Fish and Established Air Sampling Pump
|
|
Jang Bong-Ki
Chun Jae-Young
Son Bu-Soon
Lee Jong-Wha
Park Jong-An
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
This study is designed to compare the performance of established samplers (personal air sampler and MiniVOL poaable air sampler) commonly used in the air environment or work environment with that of the sampler made by remodehg the air bubble generator for aquarium fishes. Sampling method used in this study is the filter collection method for PMlO and total suspended particles (TSP), the liquid collection method for sulfur dioxide (SOz) and nitrogen dioxide (NOz), and the solid collection method for toluene, respectively. There is not a significant difference in the average concentration of TSP between the Gian personal air sampler (1 4 0.3 16 10.095; 2nd 0.191 kO.090; 3rd, 0.185 i0.073 mg/m3) and the remodeled sampler (lst, 0.3 17 i0.106, 2nd 0.201 i 0.050; 3rd 0.189 2 0.081 mg/m3). There are also not ~ i ~ c adinffetre nces in the average concentration of PMlO among the Gilian personal air sampler (0.058 k 0.006 d n f ) , the remodeled sampler (0.052 k 0.008 dm3) and the MiniVOL p d l e air sampler (0.054 i 0.007 m$nf). The average concentration of the SO2 by the established sampler and the remodeled one is 3.79 k0.21 ppb and 3.45 i0.15 ppb, respectively. In addition, there are not sigmficant differences in the average concentration of the NO2 between the Gilian personal air sampler (lst, 0.325 10.068; 2nd 0.341 10.206; 3rd, 2.971 20.078 \~g/mn~an) d the remodeled sampler (lst, 0.300 k0.062; 2nd 0.332 iO.144, 3rd 2.%8 + 0.085 pdrn3). There are not sigruficant differences in the average concentration of toluene between the G hpe rsonal air sampler (lst, 0.499 k0.072; 2nd 0.598 i0.112; 3rd 2.284 i0.077 fig/ rn3 and the remodeled sampler (lst, 0.463i0.133; 2nd 0.603 kO.082; 3rd 2.353 l o .1 15 dm3Fr)o.m these results, we can conclude that the performance of the remodeled sampler is not different fiom that of established samplers. There is possibiity that the remodeled sampler can be used as a alternative device for Gilian personal air sampler in area and personal air sampling.
|
|
|
KEYWORD
|
|
|
air sampling pump, eficiency test, remodeled bubble generating pump, personal and area sampling
|
|
|
FullTexts / Linksout information
|
|
|
|
|
|
Listed journal information
|
|
|
|